hpas 2020 history

HPAS 2020 History — Detailed Solutions and Revision Notes
14 questions • History

HPAS 2020 History
Detailed Solutions & Revision Notes

Understand the answer, check every statement, and revise the connected topic.

QUESTION 1

Consider the given four statements:
1. In 1865, High Courts were established at Calcutta, Madras and Bombay.
2. In 1791, Jonathan Dunca, started a Sanksrit College at Varanasi.
3. The first Telegraph line from Calcutta to Agra was opened in 1854.
4. The Pitt’s India Act was passed in 1785.

  • (a) 1 and 2
  • (b) 3 and 4
  • (c) 1 and 3
  • (d) 2 and 3
Corrected intended answer: (d) 2 and 3
Accuracy note
Answer correction: the upload gives (a). The intended correct combination is (d), 2 and 3. Statement 3 must be read as referring to the Calcutta–Agra connection, not the first telegraph line anywhere in India.

Detailed explanation

Statements 2 and 3 are the intended correct statements, giving option (d). The supplied answer (a) is inconsistent with the historical dates. This question tests whether you can distinguish the date of an enabling law from the establishment of an institution, and an early experimental telegraph line from a later long-distance connection.

Statement / option-by-option analysis

Statement 1 Incorrect. The High Courts at Calcutta, Bombay and Madras were established in 1862 under the Indian High Courts Act of 1861. Fresh Letters Patent were issued in 1865; that is not their original establishment year.

Statement 2 Correct. Jonathan Duncan established the Sanskrit College at Varanasi in 1791. It belongs to the early colonial policy of supporting traditional Indian learning, often called the Orientalist approach.

Statement 3 Accepted in this question. The Calcutta–Agra telegraph connection belongs to the network expansion of 1854. However, it was not India’s first experimental telegraph line: the earlier Calcutta–Diamond Harbour line dates to 1851.

Statement 4 Incorrect. Pitt’s India Act was passed in 1784, not 1785. It strengthened parliamentary oversight through a Board of Control while retaining the Company’s Court of Directors.

Expanded topic notes

  • 1773 — Regulating Act: an early attempt at parliamentary control over Company government; the Governor of Bengal became Governor-General of Bengal.
  • 1781 — Calcutta Madrasa was established under Warren Hastings; 1791 — Sanskrit College at Varanasi under Jonathan Duncan. Both are associated with Oriental learning.
  • 1784 — Pitt’s India Act: political supervision by the Board of Control alongside Company administration.
  • 1853 — the first passenger railway ran between Bombay and Thane. Railways and telegraphs improved communication but also served military and commercial colonial interests.
  • 1861 — High Courts Act; 1862 — three presidency High Courts established; 1865 — revised Letters Patent. Learn these as distinct stages.
Exam takeaway: Eliminate any pair containing statement 1 or 4. Only (d), statements 2 and 3, remains.

Reference: High Court history: 1862 and 1865

QUESTION 2

Consider the following statements:
1. Haider Ali established a Modern arsenal in Dindigal in 1757 AD.
2. Haider Ali died in 1783 AD.
3. Tipu Sultan planted a ‘Tree of Liberty’ at Srirangapatanam.
4. Tipu Sultan was a member of a ‘Jacobin Club’.

  • (a) 3 and 4
  • (b) 1 and 4
  • (c) 2 and 3
  • (d) 2 and 4
Correct Answer: (a) 3 and 4

Detailed explanation

The expected answer is (a), statements 3 and 4. The two dates attached to Haider Ali are incorrect in the usual exam chronology. The statements about Tipu refer to his association with French revolutionary symbols at Srirangapatna; this should not be confused with his becoming a member of a political club in Paris.

Statement / option-by-option analysis

Statement 1 Incorrect in the standard chronology. Haider Ali’s Dindigul command and the establishment of an arsenal with French technical assistance are associated with 1755, rather than the 1757 given here.

Statement 2 Incorrect. Haider Ali died in December 1782 during the Second Anglo-Mysore War. Tipu Sultan succeeded him and continued the war.

Statement 3 Conventionally accepted. Tipu is associated in exam accounts with a Tree of Liberty at Srirangapatna, reflecting contact with French revolutionary ideas and French personnel.

Statement 4 Conventionally accepted. Textbooks describe Tipu’s association with a Jacobin club at Srirangapatna. The precise nature of his participation is debated; the statement is used here in its conventional examination sense.

Expanded topic notes

  • First Anglo-Mysore War, 1767–1769: ended with the Treaty of Madras. Haider Ali demonstrated Mysore’s ability to challenge Company power.
  • Second Anglo-Mysore War, 1780–1784: began under Haider and ended under Tipu with the Treaty of Mangalore.
  • Third Anglo-Mysore War, 1790–1792: ended with the Treaty of Seringapatam; Tipu lost substantial territory and paid an indemnity.
  • Fourth Anglo-Mysore War, 1799: Tipu died defending Srirangapatna. Lord Wellesley was Governor-General.
  • Mysore invested in military production, artillery and iron-cased rockets. Its resistance involved both military innovation and attempts to secure external allies.
Exam takeaway: Haider died in 1782; Tipu died in 1799. A wrong year makes the whole statement wrong.

Reference: Haidar Ali: Dindigul command and arsenal

QUESTION 4

Which Indus Valley sites are in India?
1. Dholavira
2. Rakhigarhi
3. Mohen-jo-Daro
4. Ganweriwala

  • (a) 1 and 2
  • (b) 2 and 3
  • (c) 3 and 4
  • (d) 2 and 4
Correct Answer: (a) 1 and 2

Detailed explanation

Dholavira and Rakhigarhi are in present-day India, so option (a) is correct. Mohenjo-daro and Ganweriwala are in present-day Pakistan. The geographical spread of the Harappan civilisation extended across today’s international border; its name does not imply that every site lies in the modern Republic of India.

Statement / option-by-option analysis

1. Dholavira Gujarat, India. Located on Khadir island in the Rann of Kachchh, it is known for water reservoirs, stone construction and a distinctive urban layout.

2. Rakhigarhi Haryana, India. Located in Hisar district, it is one of the largest known Harappan settlements and includes important settlement and burial remains.

3. Mohenjo-daro Sindh, Pakistan. Famous for the Great Bath, planned streets and drainage. Its inclusion rules out options (b) and (c).

4. Ganweriwala Cholistan, Punjab, Pakistan. An important large settlement in the Ghaggar–Hakra region. Its inclusion rules out option (d).

Expanded topic notes

  • The mature Harappan phase is generally dated to about 2600–1900 BCE. Earlier and later phases extend beyond this range.
  • Harappa — Punjab, Pakistan; Mohenjo-daro — Sindh, Pakistan. Do not interchange their provincial locations.
  • Kalibangan — Rajasthan, associated with evidence of a ploughed field; Lothal — Gujarat, associated with a structure traditionally interpreted as a dockyard.
  • Banawali — Haryana; Ropar/Rupnagar — Punjab, India. Modern Punjab exists on both sides of the border, so specify the country.
  • Dholavira became a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2021. This is a later revision fact, not a fact that was available when an earlier paper was set.
  • Urban planning, standardised weights, craft specialisation and long-distance exchange are major features. The script remains undeciphered, limiting certainty about political institutions.
Exam takeaway: For site questions, revise site → state/province → country → distinctive archaeological feature.
QUESTION 12

Match List I with List II:

List-I (Event):
A. Delhi Darbar
B. Second Anglo Afghan war
C. Kuka Movement started
D. Queen Victoria declared ‘Kaiser-i-Hind’

List-II (Year):
1. 1872
2. 1876
3. 1878
4. 1877

  • (a) A-4, B-2, C-1, D-3
  • (b) A-4, B-3, C-1, D-2
  • (c) A-3, B-2, C-1, D-4
  • (d) A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1
Correct Answer: (b) A-4, B-3, C-1, D-2
Accuracy note
Wording clarification: “Kuka Movement started—1872” is historically imprecise. The supplied matching answer is retained, with 1872 explained as the uprising/repression date.

Detailed explanation

The intended matching is A–4, B–3, C–1, D–2, giving option (b). Delhi Durbar refers here to the imperial assembly of 1877, the Second Anglo-Afghan War began in 1878, and Victoria’s imperial title belongs to 1876. The Kuka entry needs a qualification: 1872 marks a major uprising and repression, rather than the movement’s original beginning.

Statement / option-by-option analysis

A. Delhi Darbar 1877. Lord Lytton organised the imperial assembly at Delhi to proclaim Victoria’s status as Empress of India.

B. Second Anglo-Afghan War 1878. The war lasted until 1880 and arose from British strategic concerns about Russian influence and Afghanistan.

C. Kuka Movement 1872 in this matching set. This is the year of the major Kuka episode and severe British repression at Malerkotla. The Namdhari reform tradition and Ram Singh’s organisation predate it.

D. Kaiser-i-Hind 1876. The Royal Titles Act enabled Victoria to assume the title Empress of India. The Delhi proclamation followed in 1877.

Expanded topic notes

  • The Kuka/Namdhari movement combined religious and social reform with opposition to British authority. Ram Singh is its central nineteenth-century leader.
  • Ram Singh’s organised movement is commonly dated to 1857; earlier Namdhari origins are associated with Balak Singh. Avoid learning 1872 as its absolute starting point.
  • Delhi Durbars were held in 1877, 1903 and 1911. The 1911 Durbar accompanied the announcement that the imperial capital would shift from Calcutta to Delhi.
  • The Treaty of Gandamak belongs to 1879 during the Second Anglo-Afghan War. British influence over Afghan external relations was a central issue.
  • First Anglo-Afghan War: 1839–1842; second: 1878–1880; third: 1919. These wars belong to different political settings.
Exam takeaway: Title in 1876; Durbar in 1877; Afghan war in 1878. Separate enactment, proclamation and conflict.
QUESTION 52

Who was the author of the book ‘Gulamgiri’?

  • (a) Swami Dayanand
  • (b) Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
  • (c) Mahatma Jyotiba Pule
  • (d) Swami Ramkrishan Parmhans
Correct Answer: (c) Mahatma Jyotiba Pule

Detailed explanation

Gulamgiri, translated as Slavery,, was written by Jyotirao Phule in 1873. The option’s “Jyotiba Pule” refers to Jyotiba Phule. The work challenges caste oppression and the ideological claims used to legitimise social hierarchy.

Statement / option-by-option analysis

(a) Swami Dayanand Not the author. He founded the Arya Samaj in 1875 and wrote Satyarth Prakash. His reform programme emphasised a return to the authority of the Vedas.

(b) B. R. Ambedkar Not the author. His major works include Annihilation of Caste, The Problem of the Rupee, and The Buddha and His Dhamma. His critique belongs to a later generation of anti-caste thought.

(c) Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Correct. A major social reformer from Maharashtra, he connected caste oppression with unequal access to education and social power.

(d) Ramakrishna Paramahansa Not the author. He was a spiritual teacher associated with Dakshineswar and the mentor of Vivekananda. The Ramakrishna Mission was founded later by Vivekananda.

Expanded topic notes

  • 1873 — Phule founded the Satyashodhak Samaj, or Society of Truth Seekers, to challenge caste domination and promote social equality.
  • Jyotirao and Savitribai Phule worked for girls’ education and education for socially excluded communities; their Pune school initiative began in 1848.
  • Gulamgiri was dedicated to those in the United States who worked for the emancipation of enslaved people, connecting struggles against different forms of oppression.
  • Shetkaryacha Asud, usually translated as Cultivator’s Whipcord, is another work associated with Phule and concerns the exploitation of cultivators.
  • Savitribai Phule was an educator, poet and reformer in her own right. Do not reduce her contribution to being only the wife of Jyotirao.
  • A useful comparison: Phule—Satyashodhak Samaj; Dayanand—Arya Samaj; Vivekananda—Ramakrishna Mission; Rammohan Roy—Brahmo Sabha.
Exam takeaway: 1873 links both Gulamgiri and the Satyashodhak Samaj.
QUESTION 53

In which year ‘The Indian Universities Act’ was passed?

  • (a) 1901
  • (b) 1904
  • (c) 1905
  • (d) 1909
Correct Answer: (b) 1904

Detailed explanation

The Indian Universities Act was passed in 1904 during Lord Curzon’s viceroyalty. It followed the Indian Universities Commission of 1902, chaired by Thomas Raleigh. The question tests the date of the Act, not the date of the commission that preceded it.

Statement / option-by-option analysis

(a) 1901 Incorrect. This is not the year of the Indian Universities Act. Do not choose a nearby date merely because it falls within Curzon’s tenure.

(b) 1904 Correct. The Act reorganised university administration, tightened affiliation and inspection, and increased official influence over university bodies.

(c) 1905 Incorrect. This year is associated especially with the partition of Bengal and the expansion of the Swadeshi movement.

(d) 1909 Incorrect. This year belongs to the Indian Councils Act, commonly associated with the Morley–Minto reforms and separate electorates for Muslims.

Expanded topic notes

  • 1854 — Wood’s Despatch set out a broad framework for education, including education departments and universities.
  • 1857 — universities were established at Calcutta, Bombay and Madras. These initially functioned mainly as examining and affiliating bodies.
  • 1882 — Hunter Education Commission under Ripon focused especially on primary and secondary education.
  • 1902 — Raleigh Commission; 1904 — Indian Universities Act. Distinguish inquiry from legislation.
  • 1917–1919 — Sadler Commission examined Calcutta University and the relationship between school and university education.
  • 1929 — Hartog Committee stressed consolidation and quality, including the problems of wastage and stagnation in primary education.
  • Curzon presented his measures as improvements in standards; critics saw increased government control as a restriction on educational autonomy.
Exam takeaway: Raleigh 1902 → Universities Act 1904 → Bengal partition 1905.
QUESTION 54

In which Governor General’s tenure, the Brishers conquered ‘Sindh’?

  • (a) Lord Auckland
  • (b) Lord Ellenborough
  • (c) Lord Hasting
  • (d) Lord Dalhousie
Correct Answer: (b) Lord Ellenborough

Detailed explanation

Sindh was conquered and annexed in 1843 during Lord Ellenborough’s tenure as Governor-General. Sir Charles Napier commanded the British forces. The question asks for the Governor-General, so the military commander and the political head must not be confused.

Statement / option-by-option analysis

(a) Lord Auckland Incorrect. Governor-General from 1836 to 1842, he is associated with the launch of the First Anglo-Afghan War and its disastrous outcome.

(b) Lord Ellenborough Correct. Governor-General from 1842 to 1844; the conquest of Sindh took place in 1843 during his administration.

(c) Lord Hastings Incorrect. His tenure, 1813–1823, is associated with the Anglo-Nepalese War and the Third Anglo-Maratha War. He is different from Warren Hastings.

(d) Lord Dalhousie Incorrect. Governor-General from 1848 to 1856, associated with the annexation of Punjab in 1849, Awadh in 1856 and expansion through the Doctrine of Lapse.

Expanded topic notes

  • Charles Napier defeated the forces of the Talpur rulers at Miani in February 1843 and at Dubba, near Hyderabad in Sindh, in March 1843.
  • The conquest extended Company control over the lower Indus region. Strategic communications and commercial interests formed part of the wider context.
  • Distinguish Hyderabad in Sindh from Hyderabad in the Deccan; the shared place name is a common source of confusion.
  • Punjab was annexed in 1849 after the Second Anglo-Sikh War, not in the same year as Sindh.
  • Awadh was annexed in 1856 on the stated ground of misgovernment, not through the Doctrine of Lapse.
  • A wider sequence is useful: Sindh 1843 → Punjab 1849 → Awadh 1856 → Revolt 1857.
Exam takeaway: Sindh: 1843—Ellenborough—Charles Napier—Miani and Dubba.
QUESTION 83

Statement 1: There was a provision in the Charter Act of 1833 to abolish slavery.
Statement 2: In 1855, the British merged the Riyasat of Awadh with their kingdom, accusing them of misrule.

  • (a) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are correct
  • (b) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are incorrect
  • (c) Statement 1 is correct and Statement 2 is incorrect
  • (d) Statement 1 is incorrect and Statement 2 is correct
Correct Answer: (c) Statement 1 is correct and Statement 2 is incorrect

Detailed explanation

The expected answer is (c): statement 1 is accepted with a legal qualification, while statement 2 is incorrect. The Charter Act of 1833 directed measures towards ameliorating and ending slavery; it did not instantly eliminate slavery throughout Company territories. Awadh was annexed in 1856, not 1855.

Statement / option-by-option analysis

Statement 1 Accepted in the intended sense. The 1833 Charter Act contained a provision directing action towards the mitigation and eventual extinction of slavery. A direction towards abolition must be distinguished from an immediate, comprehensive abolition measure.

Statement 2 Incorrect. Lord Dalhousie annexed Awadh in February 1856, alleging misgovernment. Nawab Wajid Ali Shah was deposed. The incorrect year makes the statement false even though the stated justification is broadly correct.

Options (a) and (d) Both treat statement 2 as correct and can therefore be eliminated using the 1856 date.

Options (b) and (c) The provision in the 1833 Act supports the intended choice (c), provided “abolish” is understood as a direction to work towards abolition.

Expanded topic notes

  • Charter Act 1833: the Governor-General of Bengal became Governor-General of India; William Bentinck was the first to hold the latter designation.
  • The Act ended the Company’s remaining commercial activities, including its privileged China trade, leaving it principally an administrative body.
  • It centralised legislative authority and provided for a law member in the Governor-General’s Council; Macaulay became the first law member.
  • The Indian Slavery Act of 1843 curtailed the legal enforcement of claims to ownership over persons and prevented specified official involvement in slave transactions. Distinguish this from the policy provision of 1833.
  • Awadh’s annexation damaged the position of the court, taluqdars and dependants; the resulting discontent contributed to the conditions behind the 1857 revolt.
  • Doctrine of Lapse concerned succession in certain dependent states. The annexation of Awadh used a different stated justification: misgovernment.
Exam takeaway: 1833 = policy provision; 1843 = Indian slavery legislation; 1856 = Awadh annexation.

Reference: Indian Slavery Act, 1843

QUESTION 84

Statement 1: Young Bengal Movement was started by Sisir Kumar Ghosh.
Statement 2: Prarthna Samaj was established in Bombay in 1865.

  • (a) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are correct
  • (b) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are incorrect
  • (c) Statement 1 is correct and Statement 2 is incorrect
  • (d) Statement 1 is incorrect and Statement 2 is correct
Correct Answer: (b) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are incorrect

Detailed explanation

Both statements are incorrect, making option (b) correct. Young Bengal is associated with Henry Louis Vivian Derozio and his students, while the Prarthana Samaj was founded in Bombay in 1867. This question changes both a founder and a date.

Statement / option-by-option analysis

Statement 1 Incorrect. Derozio inspired the Young Bengal movement among students of Hindu College in Calcutta. It encouraged reason, free inquiry and criticism of entrenched social customs.

Sisir Kumar Ghosh A journalist and nationalist associated with Amrita Bazar Patrika, founded with Motilal Ghosh in 1868. He should not replace Derozio in the Young Bengal association.

Statement 2 Incorrect. Atmaram Pandurang founded Prarthana Samaj in Bombay in 1867, not 1865. It combined monotheistic religious reform with social reform.

Option logic (a) accepts both false statements; (c) wrongly accepts statement 1; (d) wrongly accepts statement 2. Only (b) rejects both.

Expanded topic notes

  • Derozio taught at Hindu College during the late 1820s and early 1830s. His followers are often called Derozians.
  • Young Bengal questioned social and religious orthodoxy, but its influence remained limited largely to an educated urban circle.
  • Prarthana Samaj was influenced by the broader Brahmo reform current and the work of Keshab Chandra Sen.
  • M. G. Ranade and R. G. Bhandarkar were prominent figures associated with Prarthana Samaj and western Indian social reform.
  • Reform concerns included widow remarriage, women’s education, caste restrictions and the age of marriage. Religious reform and social reform frequently overlapped.
  • Brahmo Sabha—1828; Prarthana Samaj—1867; Satyashodhak Samaj—1873; Arya Samaj—1875; Ramakrishna Mission—1897.
Exam takeaway: Derozio → Young Bengal. Atmaram Pandurang → Prarthana Samaj → Bombay → 1867.
QUESTION 87

Statement 1: Mahatma Gandhi gave slogan of ‘Do or Die’ during Quit India Movement.
Statement 2: Subhash Chandra Bose established Forward Block Party in 1939.

  • (a) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are correct
  • (b) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are incorrect
  • (c) Statement 1 is correct and Statement 2 is incorrect
  • (d) Statement 1 is incorrect and Statement 2 is correct
Correct Answer: (a) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are correct

Detailed explanation

Both statements are correct, so option (a) is the answer. Gandhi’s “Do or Die” call belongs to the Quit India Movement of August 1942. Subhas Chandra Bose founded the Forward Bloc in 1939 after his conflict with the Congress leadership and resignation from its presidency.

Statement / option-by-option analysis

Statement 1 Correct. Gandhi gave the call at the Bombay meeting of the All India Congress Committee on 8 August 1942. It expressed determination to end British rule; the movement was conceived within Gandhi’s commitment to non-violent mass struggle.

Statement 2 Correct. Bose established the Forward Bloc in 1939, initially as a grouping within Congress intended to consolidate left and radical forces.

Option (a) Correct because both independent historical assertions are accurate.

Options (b), (c) and (d) Each rejects at least one accurate statement. Neither the 1942 slogan nor the 1939 organisation needs correction.

Expanded topic notes

  • The failure of the Cripps Mission in 1942 was an important immediate background to Quit India. Wartime conditions and the threat of Japanese advance intensified political tensions.
  • The resolution was adopted at Gowalia Tank Maidan in Bombay, now associated with August Kranti Maidan.
  • Major Congress leaders were arrested on 9 August 1942. The loss of central leadership contributed to decentralised protests and underground activity.
  • Aruna Asaf Ali is associated with hoisting the flag at Gowalia Tank; Usha Mehta helped operate the underground Congress Radio.
  • Parallel governments arose in places including Ballia, Tamluk and Satara, though their duration and organisation differed.
  • Bose presided over the Haripura Congress in 1938 and won re-election at Tripuri in 1939 before resigning. The Forward Bloc was not founded after the launch of Quit India.
  • Do not equate the Forward Bloc with the Indian National Army: they were different organisations with different origins.
Exam takeaway: 1939—Forward Bloc; 1942—Quit India and Do or Die. “Forward Block” in the question means Forward Bloc.
QUESTION 88

Statement 1: In 1942, S.N. Tagore established Indian Revolutionary Communist Party.
Statement 2: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar moved ‘Objective Resolution’ in Constitutent Assembly on 13th December.

  • (a) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are correct
  • (b) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are incorrect
  • (c) Statement 1 is correct and Statement 2 is incorrect
  • (d) Statement 1 is incorrect and Statement 2 is correct
Supplied / intended answer: (c) — see chronology qualification below
Accuracy note
Answer-key qualification: (c) is retained as the supplied/intended answer, not certified here as an official final key. The 1934 origin and uncertain renaming chronology are stated explicitly.

Detailed explanation

The supplied answer is (c), but statement 1 compresses a disputed organisational chronology and should be treated cautiously. Statement 2 is clearly incorrect: Jawaharlal Nehru moved the Objectives Resolution on 13 December 1946. Ambedkar’s central role in drafting the Constitution was a separate contribution.

Statement / option-by-option analysis

Statement 1 Qualified. S. N. Tagore means Saumyendranath Tagore. The Communist League, the predecessor of the Revolutionary Communist Party of India, was founded in 1934. Some exam accounts associate the RCPI name with 1942; accounts of the renaming are not uniform.

Statement 2 Incorrect. Nehru, not Ambedkar, moved the Objectives Resolution on 13 December 1946. It was adopted on 22 January 1947.

Option (c) This is the supplied answer and the intended examination treatment when statement 1 is accepted in the renaming sense. It should not be read as proof that the organisation had no history before 1942.

Option (b) Becomes arguable under a strict reading of “established in 1942”. Options (a) and (d) cannot be right because they accept the incorrect attribution to Ambedkar.

Expanded topic notes

  • 9 December 1946 — the Constituent Assembly first met; Sachchidananda Sinha served as temporary chairman.
  • 11 December 1946 — Rajendra Prasad was elected President of the Constituent Assembly.
  • 13 December 1946 — Nehru introduced the Objectives Resolution; 22 January 1947 — the Assembly adopted it.
  • 29 August 1947 — the Drafting Committee was appointed, with B. R. Ambedkar as its chairman.
  • 26 November 1949 — the Constitution was adopted; 26 January 1950 — its main provisions came into force.
  • The Objectives Resolution articulated guiding principles for the constitutional project and provided an important foundation for the Preamble.
  • Saumyendranath Tagore, Rabindranath Tagore and Surendranath Banerjea are different people. Initials alone are insufficient for accurate revision.
Exam takeaway: Nehru → Objectives Resolution. Ambedkar → Drafting Committee. Rajendra Prasad → Assembly President.

Reference: RCPI: organisational origins

Reference: Exam account: 1942 interpretation

QUESTION 93

Arrange the following events in chronological order:
1. Death of C.R. Das
2. Simon Commission appointed
3. Death of revolutionary Jatin Das
4. Nehru Report

  • (a) 1, 2, 3, 4
  • (b) 1, 2, 4, 3
  • (c) 2, 1, 3, 4
  • (d) 2, 1, 4, 3
Correct Answer: (b) 1, 2, 4, 3

Detailed explanation

The correct sequence is 1, 2, 4, 3, giving option (b): C. R. Das died in 1925; the Simon Commission was appointed in 1927; the Nehru Report appeared in 1928; Jatin Das died in 1929. The key distinction is that the commission’s appointment preceded its arrival in India.

Statement / option-by-option analysis

1. Death of C. R. Das 16 June 1925. Known as Deshbandhu, he was a prominent nationalist and a co-founder of the Swaraj Party.

2. Simon Commission appointed November 1927. Its members were all British, which provoked objections to the exclusion of Indians from reviewing their own constitutional arrangements.

4. Nehru Report 1928. Prepared by a committee chaired by Motilal Nehru, it proposed a constitutional framework based on dominion status.

3. Death of Jatin Das 13 September 1929. He died in Lahore jail after a prolonged hunger strike protesting prison conditions and the treatment of political prisoners.

Expanded topic notes

  • C. R. Das and Motilal Nehru established the Swaraj Party in 1923 after disagreement over whether nationalists should enter legislative councils.
  • The Simon Commission arrived in India in February 1928. “Appointed in 1927” and “arrived in 1928” are both correct statements about different stages.
  • Lala Lajpat Rai was injured during a protest against the Simon Commission in Lahore and died in November 1928.
  • The Nehru Report is associated with Motilal Nehru, not simply with Jawaharlal Nehru because of the shared surname.
  • Jatin Das’s hunger strike lasted 63 days. Distinguish him from Jatindranath Mukherjee, known as Bagha Jatin.
  • The Lahore Congress of December 1929, presided over by Jawaharlal Nehru, adopted Purna Swaraj as its objective.
  • 26 January 1930 was observed as Independence Day by the nationalist movement; this helped give 26 January its later constitutional significance.
Exam takeaway: Memorise the four-year ladder: 1925 → 1927 → 1928 → 1929.
QUESTION 94

Arrange these later Mughal Badshahs chronologically:
1. Jahandar Shah
2. Farrukhsiyar
3. Ahmed Shah
4. Alamgir II

  • (a) 1, 2, 3, 4
  • (b) 3, 1, 2, 4
  • (c) 1, 2, 4, 3
  • (d) 2, 1, 3, 4
Correct Answer: (a) 1, 2, 3, 4

Detailed explanation

The correct relative order is Jahandar Shah, Farrukhsiyar, Ahmad Shah Bahadur and Alamgir II, giving option (a). These four were not consecutive emperors. Several rulers, especially Muhammad Shah, came between Farrukhsiyar and Ahmad Shah; a correct ordering must not erase that gap.

Statement / option-by-option analysis

1. Jahandar Shah 1712–1713. He succeeded in the struggle following Bahadur Shah I’s death and depended heavily on the support of Zulfiqar Khan.

2. Farrukhsiyar 1713–1719. He came to power with the support of the Sayyid brothers and was eventually deposed. His 1717 farman is important in the history of Company privileges.

3. Ahmad Shah Bahadur 1748–1754. He succeeded Muhammad Shah and ruled during growing factional conflict and weakening imperial authority.

4. Alamgir II 1754–1759. He followed Ahmad Shah Bahadur. He must not be confused with Aurangzeb, who used the title Alamgir I.

Expanded topic notes

  • After Aurangzeb’s death in 1707, Bahadur Shah I ruled from 1707 to 1712. The later succession struggles strengthened the influence of powerful nobles.
  • The Sayyid brothers, Abdullah Khan and Husain Ali Khan, are often described as kingmakers in early eighteenth-century Mughal politics.
  • Muhammad Shah ruled from 1719 to 1748. Nadir Shah invaded India and sacked Delhi in 1739 during his reign.
  • Farrukhsiyar’s farman of 1717 granted important trading concessions to the English East India Company; the use and abuse of trade privileges later contributed to conflict in Bengal.
  • Shah Alam II, a later emperor, was involved in the political settlement after the Battle of Buxar in 1764 and the grant of Diwani to the Company in 1765.
  • Imperial decline did not mean all regional economic activity immediately collapsed. Bengal, Awadh and Hyderabad developed as important successor states.
  • For chronology, attach each ruler to one anchor event rather than memorising names without context.
Exam takeaway: Jahandar → Farrukhsiyar → [intervening rulers] → Ahmad Shah → Alamgir II.
QUESTION 98

Put these agrarian movements in chronological order with the date of their start:
1. Bardoli Peasants Movement
2. Khera Peasants Movement
3. Champaran Satyagrah
4. Mopla Peasants Movement

  • (a) 2, 3, 1, 4
  • (b) 3, 2, 4, 1
  • (c) 3, 4, 1, 2
  • (d) 1, 3, 2, 4
Correct Answer: (b) 3, 2, 4, 1

Detailed explanation

The correct order is Champaran (1917), Kheda (1918), the Malabar/Moplah rebellion (1921), and Bardoli (1928). This produces 3, 2, 4, 1, or option (b). “Khera” in the question refers to Kheda. The four movements involved agrarian grievances but did not have identical methods or social contexts.

Statement / option-by-option analysis

3. Champaran 1917, Bihar. Gandhi investigated the grievances of indigo cultivators, including the tinkathia obligation. It is generally identified as his first satyagraha in India.

2. Kheda 1918, Gujarat. Crop failure led peasants to seek suspension or remission of land revenue. Gandhi, Vallabhbhai Patel and local activists helped organise resistance.

4. Moplah/Mappila rebellion 1921, Malabar. Agrarian and tenancy tensions interacted with the Khilafat–Non-Cooperation mobilisation. The rebellion also involved serious communal violence; it should not be described as a purely non-violent Gandhian campaign.

1. Bardoli 1928, Gujarat. Vallabhbhai Patel led resistance to an enhanced land-revenue assessment. Disciplined organisation and the eventual settlement made it an important success.

Expanded topic notes

  • Tinkathia required indigo cultivation on three-twentieths of a holding under the prevalent arrangement. Raj Kumar Shukla helped bring the Champaran grievances to Gandhi’s attention.
  • Champaran concerned indigo cultivation and planter coercion; Kheda concerned revenue collection after crop failure; Bardoli concerned an increased revenue assessment.
  • The Ahmedabad mill workers’ strike of 1918 was an industrial labour struggle, not a peasant movement, although it belongs to the same early phase of Gandhi’s Indian campaigns.
  • In Malabar, many Mappila tenants faced oppressive agrarian relations. Anti-colonial mobilisation, religious identities and violence against civilians all need to be included in a balanced account.
  • Patel became widely associated with the title “Sardar” following Bardoli. Do not transfer leadership of Bardoli to Gandhi merely because it used satyagraha.
  • A refusal to pay revenue required collective discipline: officials could attach property and attempt auctions. Local organisation and mutual support were central to sustained resistance.
  • Earlier Mappila outbreaks occurred before 1921. In this question, “Mopla Peasants Movement” refers to the major 1921 rebellion.
Exam takeaway: 1917 Champaran → 1918 Kheda → 1921 Malabar → 1928 Bardoli.
HPAS 2020 History • End of study notes

Leave a Comment